Legal Opinion
Elwood v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided February 22, 1984No. 80-10264; CA A27555PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNewman, J.
In August, 1980, claimant filed a claim for occupational disease based on depression. ORS 656.802. 1 The referee and Workers’ Compensation Board affirmed the insurer’s denial of the claim. We reverse and remand.
In McGarrah v. SAIF, 296 Or 145, 164, 675 P2d 159 (1983), the court stated:
“[T]he on-the-job stress conditions causing the disorders must be real. That is, the events and conditions producing the stress must, from an objective standpoint, exist in reality. A worker’s inability to keep up the pace of the job is real stress. * * * The pressure of an executive or management position is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McGarrah v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
- State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. GygiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- McGarrah v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- Weiland v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- Leary v. Pacific Northwest BellOregon Supreme Court · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Adsitt v. Clairmont Water DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- Elwood v. State Accident InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Jeld-Wen, Inc. v. PageCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Leary v. Pacific Northwest BellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- Globe MacHine v. YockCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.