Legal Opinion

Compensation of Abbott v. State Accident Insurance Fund

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 7, 1980No. 78-5375, CA 15902PublishedCited by 6 opinions

GILLETTE, P. J.

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.

The issue in this workers’ compensation case is whether the claimant has suffered a compensable occupational disease. The claimant has multiple sclerosis. The resolution of the issue presented turns upon an examination of the conflicting medical evidence. After examining this evidence, both the referee and the Workers’ Compensation Board found the claim to be compensable. We affirm.

The facts, other than those relating to medical causation, are not in dispute and they may be summarized as follows: The claimant worked as a legal secretary. At the time when her multiple sclerosis became…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Weller v. Union Carbide Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Clayton v. State Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Beaudry v. Winchester Plywood CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Hutcheson v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Hamlin v. Roseburg Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Colwell v. Mentzer Investments, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Weiland v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  3. University of Florida v. MassieSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  4. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  5. Giesbrecht v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API