Legal Opinion
Noisette v. GEITHNER
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 12, 2010No. Civil Action 08-2237 (RWR)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Andre Noisette brought this action against the Treasury Secretary alleging racial discrimination and retaliation in employment in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. The Secretary has moved to dismiss, challenging venue and claiming that Noisette failed to exhaust his administrative remedies before filing this action. Because venue is proper in this district for Counts I and II and pendent venue applies to Counts III and IV, the defendant’s motion to dismiss Counts III and IV based on…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Mount v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Mokhtar v. ClintonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Faison v. Vance-CooksDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Poole v. United States Government printing/publishing office/agencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Morris v. JacksonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.