Legal Opinion

Mokhtar v. Clinton

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 13, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2012-1734PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Re Document No.: 87

MEMORANDUM OPINION

GraNting Defendant’s Motion For Summary Judgment

RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Nadia Mokhtar, an employee at the United States Department of State (the “Department”), brings this lawsuit pro se 1 against John F. Kerry, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Department, alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”) and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”) during the course of her employment. Now before the Court is the Department’s motion for summary judgment,…

2Cases cited90 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Vick v. DonahoeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  2. Sanders v. KerryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  3. Johnson v. United States GovernmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  4. Guerrero v. VilsackDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  5. Panarello v. SalazarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API