Legal Opinion
Faison v. Vance-Cooks
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 9, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2008-0714PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
Plaintiff Queenie Faison (“Faison”), an employee of the United States Government Printing Office (the “GPO”), brings this action against Defendant Davita Vance-Cooks 1 in her official capacity as the Public Printer of the United States, alleging that the GPO discriminated and retaliated against her on the basis of disability, race, sex, and age in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”), the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. (“ADEA”), and the…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Coulibaly v. KerryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Bonnette v. ShinsekiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Buie v. BerrienDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Ware v. Hyatt CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Harris v. FoxxDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.