Miller & Lux v. Kern County Land Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Page, McCutchen & Eells, Page, McCutchen, Harding & Knight, Page, McCutchen & Knight, and Charles W. Willard, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
This is an appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion for an order transferring the cause from the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco to the superior court of Kern County. Both parties are corporations which have their principal places of business in San Francisco. The action was to recover damages for injury to real property situate in Kern County. The complaint shows that plaintiff had constructed and was maintaining a canal over land belonging to defendant, which defendant, as is alleged, wrongfully obstructed to the damage of plaintiffs in the sum of twenty-five…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Davey v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- Fritts v. CampCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Staacke v. BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Miller & Lux v. Kern County Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
- Pacific Yacht Club v. Sausalito Bay Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by27 opinions
- Peiser v. MettlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Irwin v. City of Manhattan BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Dougherty v. California Kettleman Oil Royalties, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Grocers' Fruit Growing Union v. Kern Cty. Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Pascoe v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.