Fritts v. Camp
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Del Norte County denying a change of venue, and an appeal from a judgment and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Temple, C.
There are two appeals in this ease, both taken by the defendants. The first is from an order refusing to change the place of trial from Del Norte County to Siskiyou; the second, from a final judgment in favor of the plaintiff, and an order refusing defendants’ motion for a new trial. As we have reached the conclusion that the case must be dismissed, it is not necessary to consider the appeals separately.
The action was brought in Del Norte County to enjoin the defendants from dumping into Indian Creek, above plaintiff’s premises, tailings, bowlders, stones, sand, gravel, or clay from…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Widmer v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by35 opinions
- Dougherty v. California Kettleman Oil Royalties, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Rogers v. CadyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Maguire v. CunninghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- State v. Royal Consolidated Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Vaughan v. RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.