Legal Opinion

Peiser v. Mettler

California Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1958No. L. A. 24894PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

Plaintiffs appeal fro3n an order granting defendants’ motions for a change of venue from Los Angeles County to Kern County. The motions were made and granted on the grounds of (1) residence of defendants; (2) that the action involved damage or injury to real property situated in Kern County; and (3) because of convenience of witnesses.

The complaint alleges that the controversy here involved grew out of a written lease agreement involving land situated in Kern County. Plaintiffs are the original lessors, or their successors; defendant Mettler was the original lessee. Defendant Mettler assigned…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Panos v. Great Western Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
  2. California Trust Co. v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. McClung v. WattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Samuels v. OttingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Neet v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Crowley v. KatlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Slater v. BlackwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Kendall v. Ernest Pestana, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Thomson v. Continental InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Kintner v. HarrMontana Supreme Court · 1965

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API