Staacke v. Bell
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. D. J. Murphy, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
The action is brought in the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco, and the complaint alleges that on February 1, 1892, plaintiff executed and deliv*311ered to defendant, San Francisco Savings Union, his promissory note, due February 1, 1893, for sixty thousand dollars, to secure payment of which plaintiff executed á conveyance to defendants Henry 0. Campbell and Thaddeus B. Kent of certain lands in Santa Barbara county. This conveyance is set out in the complaint and is an ordinary deed of trust. The complaint then alleges that on March 8, 1893, “the defendant John S.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sacramento Bank v. AlcornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- LeBreton v. Superior Court of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Mudge v. SteinhartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Duffy v. DuffyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Camp v. LandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Parker v. ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Winchester v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Horton v. HortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Miller & Lux v. Kern County Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.