Legal Opinion

Irwin v. City of Manhattan Beach

California Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1966No. L. A. 28503PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal entered after a demurrer to an amended complaint was' sustained without leave to amend.

Plaintiff’s original complaint, filed on October 4, 1961," alleged that she was a resident of Los Angeles County and a real property owner and taxpayer in the defendant City of Manhattan Beach; that certain other property owners in that city, also named defendants, had applied to the city for a permit to construct a pedestrian overpass connecting their respective business establishments, said overpass to span a public street of the city; that defendant city was…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hurst v. City of BurlingameCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Crowe v. BoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Osburn v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Mines v. Del ValleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Moxley v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1946

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Blair v. PitchessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Moore v. California State Board of AccountancyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Harman v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Ramos v. County of MaderaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Bickel v. City of PiedmontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API