Legal Opinion

Pascoe v. Baker

California Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 1910No. L.A. No. 2527PublishedCited by 36 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

Appeal by defendant from an order changing the place of trial.

The action is for damages for personal injuries. It was commenced in the city and county of San Francisco. The defendant appeared and demanded a transfer to the county of Los Angeles, in which he resided. His motion to that end was granted. Thereafter the plaintiff moved the superior court of Los Angeles County for an order re-transferring the action to the city and county of San Francisco, basing his application on the ground of convenience of witnesses. The present appeal is from an order granting this motion.

The appellant makes…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cook v. PendergastCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Miller & Lux v. Kern County Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
  3. McSherry v. Pennsylvania Consolidated Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Heald v. HendyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Smith v. Pelton Water Wheel Co.California Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Gordon v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Willingham v. PecoraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. San Jose Hospital v. EthertonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. Newman v. County of SonomaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Scott v. StuartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API