Miller & Lux v. Kern County Land Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco refusing to change the place of trial of an action. Edward A. Belcher, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.
This action is between two corporations, each of which has its principal place of business at San Francisco, to recover damages for alleged injury to real property in Kern County. At the proper time the defendant demanded a change of the place of trial to Kern County, showing, to obtain the order, only the fact that the property alleged to have been injured is in that county. This appeal is from an adverse ruling.
Appellant bases its contention on section 392 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which provides that actions for injuries to real property must be tried in the county where the subj ect…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fresno National Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Griffin & Skelly Co. v. Magnolia & Healdsburg Fruit Cannery Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Wood v. CurreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Trezevant v. W. R. Strong Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Lewis v. S. Pac. Coast R.R.California Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by19 opinions
- Hale v. BohannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Irwin v. City of Manhattan BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Grocers' Fruit Growing Union v. Kern Cty. Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Cook v. W. S. Ray Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Miller & Lux v. Kern County Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.