Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Willemain

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 25, 1983No. [Misc. (BV) No. 29, September Term, 1982.]PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

As we did in Attorney Griev. Comm’n v. Finlayson, 293 Md. 156, 442 A.2d 565 (1982), among other cases, we shall attempt in this attorney disciplinary proceeding to use procedures directed at rehabilitation of the attorney.

Bar Counsel, acting pursuant to the provisions of Maryland Rule BV9, filed a petition with us on behalf of the Attorney Grievance Commission seeking disciplinary action against David Grant Willemain, a member of the Maryland Bar since June 20, 1974. The main thrust of the charges grew out of his representation of a client, Helen H. Shaw, who entrusted the sum of $42,500 to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. FlynnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. FinlaysonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. NothsteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GittensCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. KenneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API