Legal Opinion
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Flynn
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided June 22, 1978No. [Misc. Docket (Subtitle BV) No. 9, September Term, 1977.]PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDigges, J.
Levine, Eldridge and Cole, JJ., concur in the order only.
The only contested issue for our determination in this attorney disciplinary action is whether the indefinite suspension sanction recommended by the judicial panel should be imposed for the misconduct shown here, as is urged by attorney-respondent Robert J. Flynn, or whether that sanction should be supplanted by a disbarment order as is strenuously argued by petitioner, the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland.
In August of 1974 Mr. Flynn, in the course of practicing his profession in Prince George’s County, was retained by longtime…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. AgnewCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Bar Ass'n v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Bar Ass'n of Balto. City v. SiegelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Balliet v. BALTO. CTY. BAR ASS'NCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- In Re BartonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. KahnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. NothsteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GittensCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. KenneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.