Legal Opinion
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Nothstein
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided August 24, 1984No. Misc. (Subtitle BV), No. 15, September Term, 1983PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Judge.
In this case we shall disbar an attorney who obtained in excess of $40,000 from his law firm by submitting false expense claims.
Bar Counsel, acting pursuant to the provisions of Maryland Rule BV9 on behalf of the Attorney Grievance Commission, filed a petition with us seeking disciplinary action against Gary Zane Nothstein, a member of the Bar of this Court since December 14, 1973. The petition alleged misconduct or “in the alternative that Respondent is incompetent as that term is defined by Rule BVl(h) ....” It was asserted that Nothstein violated Disciplinary Rule 1-102(A)(3),…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. AgnewCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Bar Ass'n v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- United States v. James W. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers' Mutual Casualty Insurance v. MessengerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
- Bethlehem-Sparrows Point Shipyard, Inc. v. ScherpenisseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- In Re MeltonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Ellsworth v. Sherne Lingerie, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- United States Gypsum Co. v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GoldsboroughCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.