Attorney Grievance Commission v. Cooper
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The three judge panel having found respondent guilty of violating the Code of Professional Responsibility as set forth in the panel’s opinion, herewith attached, for which Maryland Rule BV11 a 1 requires a recommendation of either disbarment, suspension or reprimand; and
The panel having further found that respondent’s misconduct resulted from his inability to render adequate legal service “by reason of mental or physical illness or infirmity, or addiction to or dependence upon an intoxicant or drug”; and
The panel having stated that respondent’s “incompetency continues at this time” and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bar Ass'n of Balto. City v. SiegelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. CallananCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
3Cited by19 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GittensCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. KenneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. FlynnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.