Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Cooper

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 4, 1977No. [Misc. Docket (Subtitle BV) No. 10, September Term, 1976.]PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The three judge panel having found respondent guilty of violating the Code of Professional Responsibility as set forth in the panel’s opinion, herewith attached, for which Maryland Rule BV11 a 1 requires a recommendation of either disbarment, suspension or reprimand; and

The panel having further found that respondent’s misconduct resulted from his inability to render adequate legal service “by reason of mental or physical illness or infirmity, or addiction to or dependence upon an intoxicant or drug”; and

The panel having stated that respondent’s “incompetency continues at this time” and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bar Ass'n of Balto. City v. SiegelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. CallananCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GittensCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. KenneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. FlynnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API