Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Finlayson

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 24, 1982No. [Misc. (BV) No. 16, September Term, 1981.]PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

We shall attempt in this attorney disciplinary proceeding to use procedures directed at rehabilitation of the attorney which are similar to those we tried, albeit unsuccessfully, in Attorney Griev. Comm’n v. Bailey, 286 Md. 630, 408 A.2d 1330 (1979).

Bar Counsel, acting pursuant to the provisions of Maryland Rule BV9, filed a petition with us on behalf of the Attorney Grievance Commission seeking disciplinary action against Joseph A. Finlayson, Jr., a member of the Maryland Bar since June 22, 1970. The petition alleged five instances of professional misconduct which essentially involved…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MooneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. NothsteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  4. Matter of VelasquezDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API