Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Vanderlinde

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 6, 2001No. 15, Sept. Term, 2000PublishedCited by 263 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CATHELL, Judge.

The Attorney Grievance Commission, acting through Bar Counsel, filed a petition for disciplinary action against Susan K. Vanderlinde, respondent, for violation of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct (MRPC). The petition alleged that the respondent violated the provisions of MRPC 8.4 Misconduct. That rule provides:

It is professional misconduct for a lawyer to:(a) violate or attempt to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct, knowingly assist or induce another to do so, or do so through the acts of another;(b) commit a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer’s…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. AgnewCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SheridanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarlandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. KahnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WalmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by263 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GuidaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ZuckermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarfieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ReinhardtCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006

258 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API