Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Gittens

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 25, 1997No. Misc.(Subtitle BV), No. 48, September Term, 1995PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELL, Chief Judge.

The Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, the petitioner, acting through Bar Counsel, filed against James P. Gittens, the respondent, a Petition For Disciplinary Action Pursuant to Rule BV16C. 1 In that petition, noting the respondent’s conviction in federal court of theft and that this Court earlier had suspended the respondent pursuant to BV16b 2 , it alleged that the respondent, by violating Rule 8.4(b) and (c) 3 of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct, did engage in misconduct as defined in Maryland Rule BVlk. 4 We referred the matter to Judge Ronald A.…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COM'N OF MARYLAND v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. EzrinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BakasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BreschiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  5. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND v. ProtokowiczCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SabghirCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API