Legal Opinion
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Kenney
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided September 11, 1995No. Misc. Docket (Subtitle BV) No. 25PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHASANOW, Judge.
On October 19, 1994, the Attorney Grievance Commission charged Samuel F. Kenney (Kenney) with violations of Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct 1.1 (Competence), 1.3 (Diligence), 1.4 (Communication), 1.15 (Safekeeping Property), 8.1 (Misconduct), 8.4 (Misconduct), Maryland Rules BU7 and BU9, as well as Maryland Code (1989), Business Occupations and Professions Article, § 10-306. Pursuant to Maryland Rule BV9b, this Court referred the matter to the Honorable Dana M. Levitz of the Circuit Court for Baltimore County to make findings of fact and conclusions of law.
On March 3,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. AgnewCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. EzrinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. BakasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- In Re HinesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Bar Ass'n of Balto. City v. SiegelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarfieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. FezellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GallagherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.