Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Dinerman

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1992No. OSB 87-58; SC S37986PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a disciplinary proceeding instituted by the Oregon State Bar, charging in two causes of complaint that the accused engaged in conduct that violated standards of professional conduct. The Bar’s first cause of complaint charges the accused with violating former DR I-102(A)(3) 1 (now DR 1-102(A)(2)) (illegal conduct involving moral turpitude), former DR 1-102(A)(4) 2 (now DR 1-102(A)(3)) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation), and DR 7-102(A)(7) 3 (conduct involving counseling or assisting the lawyer’s client in conduct that the lawyer knows tó be illegal or…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HillerOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HockettOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Rice v. McAlisterOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ChaseOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ReckerOregon Supreme Court · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding against DannWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Matter of DannWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against BoelterWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KlugeOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Disciplinary Proceeding Against CarpenterWashington Supreme Court · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API