Legal Opinion

Wood v. Vroman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1921No. Docket No. 84PublishedCited by 34 opinions

Error to St. Clair; Tappan (Harvey), J. Case by Peter M. Wood against Mason E. Vroman for malpractice. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

The plaintiff, in 1916, was an employee in an automobile repair shop operated by Beard, Campbell & Company at’ Port Huron. He had at that time but little sight in his left'eye, owing to an injury theretofore received. On July- 31st, while testing ignition, some particles of dust and a piece of steel were blown into his right eye. He tried to remove them with a handkerchief he carried in the hip pocket of his one-piece suit, but did not wholly succeed. A similar, but unsuccessful, effort was made by a fellow workman named McLeod. Plaintiff testified that no tears formed in his eye as a result…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Mackin v. Detroit-Timkin Axle Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Perrott v. ShearerMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Miller v. TolesMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Hitchcock v. BurgettMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Hagan v. Chicago, Detroit & Canada Grand Trunk Junction RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1891

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Bruni v. TatsumiOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. City of Grand Rapids v. CrockerMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Stowers v. WolodzkoMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Siirila v. BarriosMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Fauver v. BellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1951

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API