Legal Opinion
Bruni v. Tatsumi
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided May 5, 1976No. 75-279PublishedCited by 347 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.
Plaintiffs urge reversal on five bases, to which we will address ourselves as enumerated.
1
Plaintiffs ’ proposition of law No. 1 reads:
“Where an expert medical witness testifies as to a recognized medical standard in one geographical community and extends this standard to any ‘moderately large metropolitan area’ in which the medical specialty is practiced throughout the country, the court may take judicial notice that the community in which the defendant practices his specialty is a ‘moderately large metropolitan area’, where such size and type of community is common knowledge to both the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Jerry W. Canterbury v. William Thornton Spence and the Washington Hospital Center, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Ewing v. GoodeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1897
- Wilson v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1967
- Aiken Ex Rel. Aiken v. ClarySupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- Ault v. HallOhio Supreme Court · 1928
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by347 opinions
- Lucas Burgess v. Gene FischerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Ardoin v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
- Walski v. TiesengaIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
- O'Brien v. AngleyOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Ramage v. Central Ohio Emergency Services, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
342 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.