Hitchcock v. Burgett
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kalamazoo. Trespass on the case. Defendant Hitchcock brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMarston, J.
This was an action of trespass on the case to recover damages for alleged negligence and want of skill of defendants who were surgeons, in their treatment of a severe injury to plaintiff’s hip.
Errors are assigned based upon the ruling of the court in relation to the admissibility of certain evidence, and these questions will first be considered.
It was claimed on the part of the defendants that plaintiff soon after being taken to Detroit, threw off the splints, got up and walked about on crutches. He was asked if he had not caused a letter to be written to Frank Curtis by one of the hospital…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Detroit & Milwaukee Railroad v. Van SteinburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
- Beaubien v. CicotteMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
- Kempsey v. McGinnissMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- Atlas Mining Co. v. JohnstonMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- Shaw v. HoffmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Pike v. . HonsingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FalveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- People v. FalknerMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
- Nash v. . RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Bassett v. GlockIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.