Legal Opinion

Hagan v. Chicago, Detroit & Canada Grand Trunk Junction Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1891PublishedCited by 41 opinions

Error to Macomb. (Canfield, J.) Negligence case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the, opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.

This action was brought to recover the value of certain buildings and contents destroyed by fire, alleged to have been caused by sparks thrown from an engine running upon defendant’s road, upon which plaintiff’s farm abuts. Plaintiff had judgment, and defendant appeals.

*617Plaintiff’s testimony tended to show that the fire -occurred September 15, 1888, at about 9 o’clock a. m.; •■that the buildings burned were located about 160 feet from the track; that there had been no rain for about four weeks, and everything was very dry; that there was .a high wind, which was blowing with the train, and in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Perrott v. ShearerMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Hoyt v. JeffersMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Johnson v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1889

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. People v. JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Marbury Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  3. Schoepper v. Hancock Chemical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Schedlbauer v. Chris-Craft Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Wood v. VromanMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API