Legal Opinion

City of Grand Rapids v. Crocker

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1922No. Docket No. 100PublishedCited by 217 opinions

Error to superior court of Grand Rapids; Dunham (Major L.), J. . Assumpsit by the city of Grand Rapids against Max Crocker and another for the amount of an award against plaintiff under the workmen’s compensation act. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

Herman F. Brandt, while employed as a fireman in the plaintiff city, was killed on November 24, 1918, by a collision between a “squad wagon” in which he was riding to a fire and an automobile owned by the defendants and driven by one of them, the other being a passenger therein. The collision occurred at or near the intersection of Cherry street and LaGrave avenue. Sarah E. Brandt, widow of deceased, presented a claim for compensation to the city under the provisions of the workmen’s compensation act (2 Comp. Laws 1915, § 5428 et seq.), to which the deceased and the city were both subject. An…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Middleton v. Texas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railroad v. HuntleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Attorney General v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  4. People v. BurnsMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
  5. Wood v. VromanMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by217 opinions

  1. People v. McGrawMichigan Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Turner v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  3. People v. FeezelMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  4. City of Lansing v. Township of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  5. People v. McFarlinMichigan Supreme Court · 1973

212 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API