Legal Opinion

Mackin v. Detroit-Timkin Axle Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1915No. Docket No. 44PublishedCited by 108 opinions

Error to Wayne; Hosmer, J. Case by Thomas Mackin against the Detroit-Timkin Axle Company for personal injuries. Judgment for defendant upon a verdict directed by the court. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

This case involves the constitutionality of Act No. 10, Extra Session 1912, known as the workmen’s compensation law, entitled:

*11“An act to promote the welfare of the people of this State, relating to the liability of employers for injuries or death sustained by their employees, providing compensation for the accidental injury to or death of employees and methods for the payment of the same, establishing an industrial accident board, defining its powers, providing for a review of its awards, making an appropriation to carry out the provisions of this act, and restricting the right to…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Mondou v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Borgnis v. Falk Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Jeffrey Manufacturing Co. v. BlaggSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Young v. DuncanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by108 opinions

  1. Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Naudzius v. LahrMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Western Indemnity Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Western Metal Supply Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Sheppard v. Michigan National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1957

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API