Legal Opinion

Miller v. Toles

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1914No. Docket No. 80PublishedCited by 53 opinions

Error to Ingham; Wiest, J. Case by Charles M. Miller against Louis W. Toles for malpractice. Judgment for defendant on directed verdict. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.

This is an action for malpractice against defendant, who is a surgeon in active practice in the city of Lansing. The record discloses the following material facts: The plaintiff was injured as the result of a fall from a scaffold on the 24th day of August, 1909. His ankle was badly sprained, and perhaps otherwise injured. He immediately called a physician, Dr. Tooker, who prescribed a liniment which plaintiff applied for some three or four weeks. He later went to Dr. Tooker’s office where the ankle was examined, and the injury pronounced to be a bad sprain. The plaintiff continued to use a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wood v. BarkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Mayo v. WrightMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Farrell v. HazeMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Spaulding v. BlissMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Neifert v. HasleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Cox v. Flint Board of Hospital ManagersMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Whetstine v. MoravecSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  3. Siirila v. BarriosMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Lince v. MonsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Hunter v. BurroughsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1918

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API