Legal Opinion

Siirila v. Barrios

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1976No. 56786, (Calendar No. 11)PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

This malpractice case raises three questions. The first question is whether a properly qualified medical specialist witness may testify as to the standard of care that a general practitioner should meet. The second question is what the proper standard of care should be. The third question is whether the trial court properly refused to give an instruction that proper hospital records *583may be used to show that an action had not taken place as well as that an action had taken place.

As to the first question, we hold that a specialist may testify as to the standard of care of a general practitioner…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Lince v. MonsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Naccarato v. GrobMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Miller v. TolesMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Harvey v. SilberMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Zoterell v. ReppMichigan Supreme Court · 1915

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. McLean v. HunterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
  2. Mckeesport Hospital v. The Accreditation Council For Graduate Medical EducationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  3. Lincoln v. GuptaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. People v. WhitfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Francisco v. Parchment Medical Clinic, PCMichigan Supreme Court · 1979

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API