Legal Opinion
In Re Hitselberger
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided October 26, 2000No. 99-BG-57PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Per curiam
On December 2,1998, respondent Mykel Hitselberger was disciplined in Maryland for violating eight disciplinary rules relating to two separate acts of neglect of client matters. 1 The Maryland Court of Appeals imposed an “indefinite suspension” on respondent.
On February 3, 1999, this court suspended Hitselberger from the practice of law in the District of Columbia, and directed the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) to submit its recommendation as to the appropriate discipline to be imposed in this jurisdiction. On December 2, 1999, the Board issued its Report and Recommendation,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- In Re ZilberbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Re DelaneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re SpannDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- In Re GardnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re EvansDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- In re BoykinsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- In Re ScanlonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- In Re DobbynDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- In Re MayersDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.