Legal Opinion
In re Boykins
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 29, 2010No. 08-BG-869PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OBERLY, Associate Judge:
This case is before us on a report and recommendation from the Board on Professional Responsibility concerning respondent, James R. Boykins. We accept the Board’s recommendation that respondent be suspended from the practice of law for two years. We reject, however, the Board’s recommendation that a practice monitor be used to determine whether respondent is fit to resume the practice of law. Rather, we order that respondent’s reinstatement be conditioned upon a showing of fitness established by clear and convincing evidence in accordance with D.C. Bar Rule XI, § 16.
I.…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re DelaneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re RebackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- In Re HutchinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- In Re RoundtreeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re VohraDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- In re BradleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- In re Brigitte L. AdamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
- In re FoxDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- In re GonzalezDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.