Legal Opinion
In Re Scanlon
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 6, 2005No. 04-BG-432PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
The Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”), in accord with the Hearing Committee, has found that respondent violated Rules 8.1(b) (failure to respond to disciplinary authority) and 8.4(d) (serious interference with the administration of justice) of the Rules of Professional Conduct and D.C. Bar R. XI, § 2(b)(3) (failure to comply with an order of the Board). Respondent’s misconduct occurred during the course of Bar Counsel’s investigation of respondent involving an allegation of unauthorized practice of law while suspended. 1 Respondent did not respond to Bar Counsel letters that were…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re DelaneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re LillyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re GilesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- In Re HitselbergerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re CooperDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- In Re BrownDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- In Re GodetteDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- In Re GodetteDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- In re GriffinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008