Legal Opinion
In Re Mayers
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 20, 2008No. 05-BG-1342PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
The Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”), in accord with the Hearing Committee, has found that respondent, Oscar S. Mayers, 1 violated Rules 3.3(a)(1) (making a false statement of material fact to a tribunal); 3.4(a) (altering evidence); 3.4(b) (falsifying evidence); 8.4(a) (violating the Rules through the acts of another); 8.4(b) (committing a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer); 8.4(c) (engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation); and 8.4(d) (engaging in conduct that seriously…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re DelaneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re HutchinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- In Re KerseyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- In Re HitselbergerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- In Re ParshallDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re GubermanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- In Re ZodrowDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- In re Oscar S. Mayers, Jr.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015