Legal Opinion

Franklin Pavkov Construction Co. v. James G. Roche, Secretary of the Air Force

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided March 22, 2002No. 01-1010PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (the “Board”). On appeal, Franklin Pavkov Construction Company (“FPC”) seeks an equitable adjustment for claims arising from a fixed-price contract to install four sets of three-story stairs on two dormitory buildings at Shaw Air Force Base, South Carolina (the “Project”). FPC argued that it received defective specifications and defective government-furnished material, and that it was entitled to other adjustments. The Board denied all but one of FPC’s claims. We affirm the Board’s decision.

I. BACKGROUND

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Andersen Consulting v. The United States, and Computer Sciences Corporation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  3. Essex Electro Engineers, Inc.,appellant v. Richard J. Danzig, Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  4. Ordnance Research, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  5. Space Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. AAB Joint Venture v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  2. R.P. Wallace, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  3. L.W. Matteson, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  4. The Tolliver Group, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
  5. Southern Comfort Builders, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API