Legal Opinion
Space Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided December 12, 1972No. 328-70PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKtjNzig, Judge
In issue in this government contract case is whether Decision No. 10365 of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (the Board) that a missing drawing created an obvious omission will withstand Wunderlich Act Beview, él U.'S.'C. ■§§ 321, 322 (1970). Is the decision so arbitrary and unsupported by substantial evidence or is it so erroneous as a matter of law that it should be overturned ?
We hold that Decision No. 10365 does warrant finality and that the Board’s action is conclusive.
Plaintiff also seeks recovery on two alternative grounds which we hold to be equally without merit.
On July…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Beacon Construction Co. of Massachusetts v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1947
- Blount Brothers Construction Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Dale Construction Co. v. United States, Seaboard Surety Co.United States Court of Claims · 1964
- Micheal Chernick and Belle Chernick v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Newsom v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- E.L. Hamm & Associates, Inc. v. Gordon R. England, Secretary of NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- S.O.G. of Arkansas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- George Hyman Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
- The Boeing Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.