Legal Opinion

L.W. Matteson, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 20, 2004No. 01-542CPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

BLOCK, Judge.

I. Introduction

This case involves a breach of a fixed-price dredging contract that required the dredging, transporting, and depositing of material from two stockpile areas located near Alma, Wisconsin. Before this court is the government’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”).

The two parties to the contract are plaintiff, L.W. Matteson, Inc. (“Matteson”), an experienced government contractor and established hydraulic dredging company, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (“the Corps”). The contract…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  4. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. St. Christopher Associates, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  2. Renda Marine, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  3. Record Steel & Construction, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  4. Bell/Heery v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  5. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API