Legal Opinion
Harris v. Zoning Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 12, 2002No. SC 16542PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
The plaintiffs,1 owners of large parcels of undeveloped land in the town of New Milford (town), *404appeal2 from the judgment of the trial court dismissing the plaintiffs’ appeal from the decision of the defendant, the zoning commission of the town of New Milford (zoning commission), that amended the definition of the phrase “lot and area” in the town’s zoning regulations (amendment). The amendment excluded certain types of land from the calculation of the minimum lot area required for the purposes of residential development. We affirm the judgment of the trial court dismissing the…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Winchester Woods Associates v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Bloom v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Burnham v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Primerica v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Protect Hamden/North Haven from Excessive Traffic & Pollution, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Briggs v. McWeenySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Eder Bros. v. Wine Merchants of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Webster Bank v. ZakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Vibert v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Anderson House, LLC v. Mayor of RockvilleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.