Legal Opinion
Vibert v. Board of Education
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 23, 2002No. SC 16596PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ZARELLA, J.
The defendant, the board of education of Regional School District Number 10 (board), appeals from the trial court’s judgment rendered in accordance with that court’s granting of the plaintiff David Vibert’s motion for summary judgment and issuance of a writ of mandamus compelling the board to provide the plaintiff with legal counsel to defend a certain civil action brought against him. The board claims that the trial court improperly determined that General Statutes § 10-235 (b)1 requires the board to provide the plaintiff with *169legal representation. We agree and,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Willow Springs Condominium Ass'n v. Seventh BRT Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Orticelli v. PowersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- King v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- City of Norwich v. SilverbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Harris v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- State v. LuttersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Hartford Courant Co. v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- American Promotional Events, Inc. v. BlumenthalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Johnson Electric Co. v. Salce Contracting Associates, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- First Union National Bank v. Hi Ho Mall Shopping Ventures, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.