Legal Opinion
Webster Bank v. Zak
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 26, 2002No. SC 16489PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
The sole issue in this certified appeal is whether the Appellate Court properly reversed the judgment of the trial court and remanded the case to that court for factual findings regarding the standing of the defendant MFR of East Hampton, LLC (MFR), as the successor in interest to certain real property that was the subject of a foreclosure action. We reverse the judgment of the Appellate Court.
The record reveals the following undisputed facts and procedural history. On July 16, 1997, the plaintiff, Webster Bank (bank), brought an action seeking to foreclose a mortgage on three…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- In Re: Russell Schwartz Linda Schwartz, Debtors. Russell Schwartz Linda Schwartz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- State v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- In Re Cynthia WARD, Debtor-Appellee. Appeal of BOWEST CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Olson v. Accessory Controls & Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Miller v. EganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Peters v. Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Hartford Courant Co. v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Bender v. BenderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- State v. AquinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.