Legal Opinion
Burnham v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 15, 1983No. 10754PublishedCited by 117 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
The defendant has appealed from a judgment sustaining the plaintiff’s appeal from a decision of the defendant denying a zone change. The trial court found the following facts: The plaintiff is the owner of 9.1 acres of land in the town of South Windsor. He also owns property in the town of East Hartford which is contiguous to the South Windsor property.
The property is zoned rural residential which calls for a minimum lot area of 40,000 square feet and a minimum lot width of 175 feet. The plaintiff applied for a zone change of the property to A-20 which requires a 20,000 square foot lot area…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- First Hartford Realty Corp. v. Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Goldberg v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Stiles v. Town CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- Calandro v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Kleinsmith v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by117 opinions
- Primerica v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- City of New Haven v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- West Hartford Interfaith Coalition, Inc. v. Town CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Frito-Lay, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Protect Hamden/North Haven from Excessive Traffic & Pollution, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.