Protect Hamden/North Haven from Excessive Traffic & Pollution, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
The principal issue of this appeal is whether the trial court exceeded the proper scope of review of the decision of the named defendant, the *529Hamden planning and zoning commission (commission), in amending the Hamden zoning regulations regarding the development of shopping centers. The defendants1 appeal2 from the judgment of the court sustaining the zoning appeal of the plaintiffs3 that challenged the decision of the commission.
The defendants claim that: (1) the court employed an improper scope of review and, therefore, improperly concluded that the commission’s decision was not supported by…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Adolphson v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Burnham v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Primerica v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Whittaker v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Summ v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- Bloom v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- West Hartford Interfaith Coalition, Inc. v. Town CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Kelley Property Development, Inc. v. Town of LebanonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Kaufman v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.