Legal Opinion

Foster v. Fisher

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 4, 1941No. Civ. 12919PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.

Appellants Day and Johnson have taken this appeal from a, judgment in favor of respondent and against appellants and their co-defendant Fisher in an action brought by respondent to recover the reasonable rental value of certain oil well drilling equipment.

The action is founded upon three written agreements, all executed on January 7, 1938, although one was antedated as of September 30, 1937. The agreements provide in substance for the rental by respondent’s assignor, P. W. Willett, Inc., of certain drilling equipment consisting of boilers, drill pipe, etc., to be used in the drilling of two…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Domestic & Foreign Petroleum Co. v. LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Gillin v. HopkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  3. Chain v. EhrmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. Smith v. DrakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Woody v. Security Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Miller v. JohnstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Pacific Finance Corp. v. FoustCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Robison v. HanleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. People v. WatkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Rivett v. NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API