Legal Opinion
Woody v. Security Trust & Savings Bank
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 20, 1934No. Docket No. 1294PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
Plaintiffs brought this action to quiet title to eighty acres of land in Kern County. The answer of defendants is not in the record. No point is made of this omission and as both counsel agree that the answer denied title of the land in the plaintiffs and stated no affirmative defense we will assume that this correctly summarizes the missing pleading. Judgment went for plaintiffs, and defendants have appealed.
On April 22, 1890, David S. Coverdale filed his application in the United States land office to homestead land in Kern County, of which that involved in this action was a portion. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- American National Bank of San Francisco v. A. G. Sommerville, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1923
- Cordano v. KelseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- Drew v. Superior Court of Mendocino CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Coleman v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Nevada National Bank v. Poso Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Estate of DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Nelssen v. Electrical District No. 4Arizona Supreme Court · 1942
- Foster v. FisherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Larkin v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949