Legal Opinion
Chain v. Ehrman
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 31, 1928No. Docket No. 5479PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD (W. J.), J., pro tem.
Plaintiff recovered a judgment in the sum of $710.50 which he alleged was due as rent for certain premises in the city of Bakersfield. From this judgment defendants appeal. The Bakersfield Tobacco Company occupied the premises in question in the first instance under a lease executed on January 22,1922, for a period of two years from February 15, 1922. This lease, which was signed by Gustave J. McGregor, then a partner of the Ehrmans in the company, contained a provision giving the lessee an option of renewal. The defendants Ehrman became successors to the interest of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Carpy v. DowdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Ballard v. NyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Beardsley v. ClemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Crescent City Wharf & Lighter Co. v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Heffernan v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Thompson v. MacHadoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Ripani v. Liberty Loan Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1979
- Feeney v. ClappCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Foster v. FisherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Sloan v. HiattCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.