Gillin v. Hopkins
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. Stanley A. Smith, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
ELLISON, J., pro tem.
The complaint in this action alleges that, at the special instance and request of the defendants, the plaintiff performed certain services, to wit: sold one hundred and seventy-five thousand shares of the Cat Canyon Oil Company; that defendants promised to pay plaintiff four thousand five hundred dollars for such services so rendered; that upon request they have refused to pay the same or any part thereof, and judgment is asked for that amount. The defendants answered by a general denial and also filed a counterclaim in which they alleged that they had loaned and advanced…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Treu v. KirkwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Johnson v. De WaardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Sieck v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Brown v. SweetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Foster v. FisherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.