Legal Opinion

Miller v. Johnston

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 28, 1969No. Civ. 25265PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSims, J.

Defendants Johnston have appealed 1 from a judgment which subjects two portions of their property to easements for pedestrian and vehicular ingress and egress to the property of plaintiffs Miller. The judgment requires plaintiffs to bear the costs of maintaining the improvements over the easements and to adjust their use of the easements so as to permit near maximum use by defendants while allowing reasonable ingress and egress to plaintiffs’ property, and permanently enjoins the defendants from interfering with the reasonable use and enjoyment of the easements by plaintiffs.

In its…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Eastman v. PiperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  2. Johns v. ScobieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Christensen v. TuckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Bard v. KentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Key v. McCabeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Hirshfield v. SchwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. Lystarczyk v. SmitsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Field-Escandon v. DeMannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  4. Windsor Pacific LLC v. Samwood Co.California Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. MacDonald Properties, Inc. v. Bel-Air Country ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API