Pacific Finance Corp. v. Foust
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.
Plaintiff sought to quiet its title to 10 used automobiles. The cars had been delivered by defendants to a used car dealer for sale. The basic questions were whether said dealer was a factor in the transaction, and whether anestoppel operated in plaintiff’s favor. The trial court found for plaintiff on both issues. From the judgment accordingly entered, defendants appeal, contending in the main that the evidence does not sustain the findings. However, viewing the record in the light most favorable to plaintiff, and indulging every inference in its favor in determining whether there is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Kenny v. ChristiansonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Foster v. FisherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Siegel v. BaylessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Insurance Co. of the West v. Haralambos Beverage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1987
- Martinez v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- Duncan v. Sunset Agricultural MineralsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Miller v. JohnstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Hunter v. CroysdillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.