Robison v. Hanley
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
Plaintiff’s intestate 1 brought an action to quiet title to a house and lot in San Francisco. Defendants cross-complained to quiet their title to the property. From a judgment in defendants’ favor, plaintiff appeals.
Questions Presented
Sufficiency of the evidence. The evidence establishes that the merits and equities are all on the side of defendants. Plaintiff relies upon technical contentions that a certain trust was never terminated or repudiated.
Evidence
Plaintiff denied much of defendants’ testimony concerning the facts of the case. Plaintiff’s testimony, however, was highly evasive,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Colton v. StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Millard v. HathawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Goss v. FanoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Nicolds v. StorchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Foster v. FisherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Stinemeyer v. Wesco Farms, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Clontz v. FortnerIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
- McKinley v. BuchananCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- De Vrahnos v. GeorgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Hamud v. HawthorneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.