Legal Opinion

Robison v. Hanley

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 9, 1955No. Civ. 16480PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.

Plaintiff’s intestate 1 brought an action to quiet title to a house and lot in San Francisco. Defendants cross-complained to quiet their title to the property. From a judgment in defendants’ favor, plaintiff appeals.

Questions Presented

Sufficiency of the evidence. The evidence establishes that the merits and equities are all on the side of defendants. Plaintiff relies upon technical contentions that a certain trust was never terminated or repudiated.

Evidence

Plaintiff denied much of defendants’ testimony concerning the facts of the case. Plaintiff’s testimony, however, was highly evasive,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Colton v. StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Millard v. HathawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Goss v. FanoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Nicolds v. StorchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. Foster v. FisherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Stinemeyer v. Wesco Farms, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Clontz v. FortnerIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  3. McKinley v. BuchananCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. De Vrahnos v. GeorgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Hamud v. HawthorneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API