Legal Opinion

Maloy v. Smith

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 14, 1959No. 36556PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Justice.

The trial court entered judgment against the plaintiff, Nettie J. Maloy, on her peti tion to quiet title and in favor of defendants, M. M. Smith and Elder Smith, on their cross-petition to reform a deed and to quiet title. Plaintiff appeals.

The primary issue is presented by plaintiff’s contention that the statute of limitations had barred defendants’ cross-action for reformation. The action was commenced in 1953. On October 15, 1940, the defendants executed a warranty deed conveying their farm to plaintiff’s predecessors in title, J. B. Shannon and Lillian Georgia Shannon.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hudson v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Skinner Et Ux. v. Scott Et Ux.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Harrell v. NashSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  4. Newbern v. GouldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. Pepper v. TruittCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Schepp v. HessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. CALVERT v. SWINFORDSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
  3. Sargent v. CoolidgeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  4. Viersen v. BoettcherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  5. Diem v. DiemSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API