Legal Opinion
Schepp v. Hess
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 13, 1989No. 67607PublishedCited by 95 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Vice Chief Justice.
The dispositive issues are: 1) Did the trial court have the authority to vacate its decree and to pronounce a new decision on the merits in response to a timely term-time “motion to reconsider” rested on grounds different from those prescribed by 12 O.S.1981 § 10311 as well.as on grounds *36which may have been available to the mov-ant under 12 O.S.1981 § 651, which motion was filed more than ten but within thirty days of the decree’s rendition?2 and 2) If so, does the trial court’s order of vacation that is combined with its new decree on the merits manifest an exercise…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Foutch v. O'BRYANTIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
- Horizons, Inc. v. Keo Leasing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Hogan v. BaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Cleary Petroleum Corp. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Salyer v. National Trailer Convoy, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- Strelecki v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Rodgers v. HigginsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- SMITH v. CITY OF STILLWATERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- DuLaney v. Oklahoma State Department of HealthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Globe Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.